Manuel Castells concludes the Information Age trilogy by considering the intersection of the global network society and factional project identities. As always, the scope of Castell’s argument is far-ranging. Among the subjects addressed are the collapse of the Soviet Union; the potential emergence of the Asian Pacific as the next region of major world power; and the rapidly increasing growth of a “Fourth World”– a series of “black holes of informational capitalism” (areas that have been cut off from the flow of wealth and information in the global economy) that refuses to confine itself to national borders–as likely to appear in the American inner city as it is in sub-Saharan Africa. He also raises the specter of a “global criminal economy,” a dark counterpart to transnational corporations, and suggests that trends such as fascination with gangster movies “may well indicate the cultural breakdown of traditional moral order, and the implicit recognition of a new society, made up of communal identity and unruly competition.” End of Millennium is perhaps the most accessible of Castell’s three volumes, expertly reading the pulse of late-20th-century social trends. It’s bound to provoke debate about any efforts to shape the trends of the 21st century.
Customer Reviews
Sent an old edition:
I was sent the first edition of this book even though a second is already out and has been for years. Not disclosed that this was older edition.
Is information technology the culprit?:
Many of the observations Prof. Catells made are valid, however the connection between information technology and the social problems are not very strong. The network states, global criminal society, wealth disparity, etc. are more or less the byproduct of globalization. Yes, information technology accelerates the rate of globalization. But would those social problems exist without information technology? Mostly likely yes. These phenomena are not new, they predate the advent of the Information Age (the World Wide Web and mass adoption of internet is a post-1990 phenomenon). Multinatioal organizations (or globalization) have been around for many decades, same goes for the North-South polical economic paradigm. So, attributing all these social problems to the Information Age (at least that is the impression I got out of it) may not be an accurate representation. Nonetheless, his trilogy does demonstrate the acute problem of a global digital divide, and he suggested some possible solutions in some of his other books.
don’t read it if you can help it:
This is a horrible book and very hard to read. The author writes with long sentences that use big words throughout, that are not necessary in understanding his concepts. This book could have been written in half the words and you would have actually been able to comprehend it. VCR manuals read better than this book.
whose evaluation?:
Who is entitlted to judge ‘project identity’ over ‘risistant identity’ without recognizing firstly the issues of power, source, context? It is reasonable to imbue ‘project identity’ to those self-programming producers as well as to those nation-states that are capable of lunching a war just for their national or religious identity. But it could be harmful to suggest those generic labor give up ‘resistant identity’ while they are not yet organized or empowered. Not mention to those minority or aboriginal people, who could become extinct without resistance. In fact, why should not a resistant identity be counted as a ‘project’ in the first place?
At any rate, the descriptive part of the book is a good reference for those who never watch/read international news.
This is an outstanding book that deals with our world.:
I read this book as a stand-alone book even though it is No. 3 of a trilogy. Castells deals with the most important issues of our times, and he does so, in a serious, scholarly, but readable way. This book is “must” reading for people in economics, politics, policy studies as well as in the other social sciences. Interested lay persons will find this book quite accessible..
